[personal profile] jenett
Happy Friday!


Useful notes
Consider tracking this post to get notifications of new comments. Select the bell icon (or the words 'track this'). More help over here, and more about notifications in general here.

Comments are welcome whenever you get a chance - even if that's hours or days later. Feel free to jump into whatever sub-threads intrigue you. More discussion is the point of the salon posts!

Got a question you're trying to sort out, or a thing you'd like to discuss? Lots of thoughtful interesting people with a wide range of interests show up here! Feel free to ask about things you're thinking about or trying to solve, as well as other kinds of chat.

Topic of the week
There is a comment by Janet's father, in [personal profile] pameladean's Tam Lin that one can be entirely ignorant of three periods in one's field, and still be a perfectly reasonable sort of professor.

I am, in fact, generally a lot more lousy about the period between 1780 and about 1910 than other points in Western history or literature.

Which leads me to a question...

For reasons tangentially related to my work (seriously, my job), I have been invited to a tea party celebrating Jane Austen's birth in mid-December. It has been a long time since I've read any Austen. (I'm pretty sure I went through Pride and Prejudice, Persuasion, and Emma at various points around high school.)

Clearly, I should read or reread at least one book before this party, so as to make appropriate conversation. Tell me, oh, inestimable commenters, if you have a recommendation, or how you'd approach this question if you don't have a rec.

Or, y'know, talk about periods of history you have mostly ignored in favour of others, what you're up to, the amusements of your pets, and/or whatever else intrigues you at the moment.

What I've been up to
I won Nano! Go me. (Go everyone else who's made the attempt!) I still have too-much-heat issues in my apartment (boo).


House rules:
This is a public post, feel free to encourage other people to drop by, just note the 'if posting anonymously, include a name people can call you in responses' rule.

* Consider this a conversation in my living room, only with a lot more seating. I reserve the right to redirect, screen, and otherwise moderate stuff, but would vastly prefer not to have to.

* If you don't have a DW account or want to post anonymously, please include a name we can call you in this particular post. (You can say AnonymousOne or your favourite colour or whatever. Just something to help keep conversations clear.)

* If you've got a question or concern, feel free to PM me.

Date: 2018-11-30 04:02 pm (UTC)
birke: (Default)
From: [personal profile] birke
I agree with Brithistorian's recommendations. I also think that if you have time to read two books, you should read Northanger Abbey, because it's funny in a different way and therefore indicative of her range. I have yet to read a Gothic novel of that time period, which would probably make it more interesting, but I also feel as if I've read half of a Gothic novel simply by reading Austen's parody of one.

Date: 2018-11-30 04:45 pm (UTC)
lapin_agile: (book/reader)
From: [personal profile] lapin_agile
This is my recommendation, too. Read P&P first. If you catch the bug for Austen's wry view of the world, then definitely also read S&S. But. If you have time for only two, consider making Northanger Abbey your second because it is Austen's send up of the Gothic* and is, thus, good to be able to chat about if you are going (tea) party with Austen fans.

* which I think you'd enjoy


What organization is throwing the tea party?

Date: 2018-11-30 05:05 pm (UTC)
lapin_agile: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lapin_agile
Oh, fun!

I hope it is quirky and charming in all the best ways. What a great way to meet a colleague!
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 01:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios