Why am I not seeing a difference between the two #22s? (They look like the same quote to me, and I didn't mean to change it if I did: I copy-pasted, so they should be the same.)
As far as the others - the stuff I pulled (and especially 43/45) are good quotes, and they still make me think. But they weren't showing up in readings, and they weren't being particularly relevant/helpful the few times they have shown up. And while the deck can vary in number (and I'm not fixed to a maximum number), I find 65-75ish is about as much as I can shuffle comfortably. (At least unless I shift to a denser card stock.)
(I suspect this is partly about what kinds of things I tend to use it for readings - many of my things are directional choices, where the religious-mystery pieces are not as useful in terms of advice as they might be.)
But as I said - we see. If I feel they're missing, I can always re-add. Much thanks for the comments.
no subject
As far as the others - the stuff I pulled (and especially 43/45) are good quotes, and they still make me think. But they weren't showing up in readings, and they weren't being particularly relevant/helpful the few times they have shown up. And while the deck can vary in number (and I'm not fixed to a maximum number), I find 65-75ish is about as much as I can shuffle comfortably. (At least unless I shift to a denser card stock.)
(I suspect this is partly about what kinds of things I tend to use it for readings - many of my things are directional choices, where the religious-mystery pieces are not as useful in terms of advice as they might be.)
But as I said - we see. If I feel they're missing, I can always re-add. Much thanks for the comments.